Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1033220160060020057
Journal of Acute Care Surgery
2016 Volume.6 No. 2 p.57 ~ p.61
Acute Care Surgery Model for Emergency Cholecystectomy
Song Myoung-Je

Lee Kyoung-Mi
Kim In-Byung
Ha Heon-Kyun
Kim Wan-Sung
Moon Hyoun-Jong
Jeong Jin-Ho
Choi Kang-Kook
Abstract
Purpose: Acute care surgery (ACS) models have evolved worldwide over the last decade. However, South Korea has an established trauma system and does not consider the ACS model. This study compares the management and outcome of emergency cholecystectomy in the ACS model to those of traditional on-call attending surgeon model for emergency surgery.

Methods: Retrospectively collected data for patients who underwent emergency cholecystectomy from May 2013 to January 2015 was analyzed to compare data from a traditional on-call system (OCS) and ACS.

Results: One hundred and twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study (62 patients ACS vs. 62 patients OCS). Hospital stay (days) (ACS=4.29¡¾2.49 vs. OCS=4.82¡¾4.48, p=0.46) and stay in emergency room (minutes) (ACS=213.10¡¾113.99 vs. OCS=241.10¡¾150.73, p=0.20) did not differ significantly between groups. Operation time (minutes) was significantly shorter in the ACS than OCS group (389.97¡¾215.21 vs. 566.35¡¾290.14, p<0.001). Other clinical variables (sex, open-conversion rate, whether the operation was performed at night/holiday, intensive care unit admission rate) did not differ between groups. There was no mortality and readmission.

Conclusion: The implementation of the ACS led to shorter operation time and no increase of postoperative mortality and complication.
KEYWORD
General surgery, Time, Cholecystectomy, Gall bladder, Wounds and injuries
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø